M.S. Sonak, J.

1. Heard. The learned Counsel for the parties.

2. In both these appeals, the challenge is to the Judgment, Order and Decree dated 29 December 2007, made by the Ad-hoc District Judge, (FTC-I), Panaji (Trial Court) in Civil Suit No. 48/2006. The operative portion of the Judgment and Order reads as follows:

"The suit is partly decreed. The defendants are directed to refund the amount of Rs. 4,07,000/- deducted by the defendants towards the non supply of jeep, with interest @ of 6% per annum from 19.2.2001 till date of actual payment and the defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of Rs. 53,800 deducted by the defendants towards compensation for delay with interest @ 6% per annum from 31.3.2004 till actual payment and the defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of Rs. 1,21,832/- deducted by the defendants towards royalty @ interest of 6% per annum from 31.3.2004 till actual payment and the defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- deducted by the defendants towards laboratory apparatus, wi