SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 189

VIBHA KANKANWADI
Isaq Nawab Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
Maidabee – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Ashtekar, Adv., M.D. Thube-Mhase, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

1. Present appeal has been filed by original defendant No.1 challenging the Judgment and Decree passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.129/2011 passed by District Judge-1, Latur on 03.05.2016, in which Judgment and Decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No.8/2005 by 2nd Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Ausa, Dist. Latur dated 16.06.2011 was challenged. Present respondent No.1 was the original plaintiff and she had filed suit for declaration and possession.

2. Plaintiff had come with a case that she purchased 80 Ares land from Gat No.319, which is more particularly, described in para No.1 of the plaint, situated at village Fattepur, Tq. Ausa, from one Gafur Nawab Shaikh on 28.12.1999. She had also purchased 4 Aana share in the well along with the same. It is stated that since the date of the purchase of the property she is in peaceful possession. Defendant No.1 was having 8 Aana share and defendant No.2 was having 8 Aana share each, in the well, in the suit property. The son of the plaintiff is in Military and therefore plaintiff and her husband used to reside along with their son, but they used to visit suit property of tenly. Taking disadvantage of this fact


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top