SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 523

M.G.GIRATKAR
Gajanan – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Madhur Deo, Adv., S.D. Sirpurkar, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

M.G. Giratkar, J.

Heard learned counsel Shri Deo for the applicants and Shri Sirpurkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State/respondent.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

3. The present revision is against the judgment of conviction passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gadchiroli in Summary Criminal Case No. 337/2014 by which the applicants were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 186, 509 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The said judgment was challenged before the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli in Criminal Appeal No. 34/2016. Said appeal was partly allowed by the Sessions Judge. The conviction for the offence punishable under Section 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code came to be quashed and set aside but maintained the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate First Class for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 186 and 509 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The case of the prosecution against the applicants (hereinafter referred to as 'accused') in short is that the complainant was working as secretary of gram panchayat and accused were members of gram panchayat. On 29-3-20































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top