SADHANA S.JADHAV
SATYAJEET @ NANA SHIVAJIRAO KADAM – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH VINAYAK KSHIRSAGAR – Respondent
Sadhana S. Jadhav, J.
The Petitioner herein challenges the election of the respondent, who has been declared elected from Constituency No. 276, Kolhapur North during the election of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly held on 15/10/2014. The Petitioner herein had also contested the said election as official candidate on the ticket of Indian Congress Party, whereas the Respondent was contesting the election on the ticket of Shivsena party. The main contention of the petitioner is that the respondent has not disclosed all the offences registered against him at various police stations in which he is charge-sheeted for offences which are punishable for more than two years It is contended that there is suppression of facts That ,he has not complied with the mandate of section 33A(1)(i) and Rule 4A of the representation of People's Act which has caused improper acceptance of his nomination paper by the Returning Officer and therefore his election is liable to be set aside.
2. The ground of challenge would in fact, commence from the very day of the filing of the nomination i.e. 27/9/2014. The respondent herein had filed his affidavit under Rule 4A of the Conduct of Election Rules
Kisan Shankar Kathore v/s. Arun Dattatray Sawant & ors.
Resurgence India v/s. Election Commission of India and anr.
Anil Saran v/s. State of Bihar and anr.
S.R. Sukumar v/s. S. Sunaad Raghuram
Charan Lal Sahu v/s. Giani Zail Singh and anr.
Satish Mahadeo Rao Uke v/s. Devendra Gangadhar Fadnavis
Anil Saran V/s. State of Bihar and anr.
Ram Sarup Gupta (dead) by L.R.s v/s. Bushan Narain Inter college and others.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.