SUNIL B.SHUKRE, S.M.MODAK
PRIYA – Appellant
Versus
HITESH – Respondent
Sunil B. Shukre, J.
Heard.
2. Admit.
3. Heard finally by consent by dispensing with the paper book.
4. This appeal questions the legality and correctness of the judgment and decree dated 29th June, 2018 passed in Hindu Marriage Petition being Hindu Marriage Petition No.A-872/2015 thereby declaring that the marriage of the appellant with the respondent was null and void in terms of Section 5 (i) read with Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter called as, "the Act of 1955"). Briefly stated, the facts of the case are as under :
(A) The marriage of the appellant with the respondent was solemnized on 24.12.2013 at Nagpur. It was in accordance with the religious rights and customs applicable to the Sindhi community to which both the parties belong. After the marriage, the appellant started to co-habit with the respondent in matrimonial house at Nagpur. But, soon after some discord arose between the two and it also affected the other members of the family of the respondent. Some talks were held between the parents and maternal relatives of the appellant on the one hand and respondent and in-laws of the appellant on the other, but there was no solution found to put an
Harihar Prasad Singh and others vs. Balmiki Prasad Singh and others
Ram Sarup Gupta (dead) by LRs. vs. Bishun Narain Inter College and others
Anil Vasudev Salgaonkar vs. Naresh Kushali Shigaonkar
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore-1 vs. Bal Pharma Limited, Bangalore and others
Yamanaji H. Jadhav vs. Nirmala
Rameshchandra Rampratapji Daga vs. Rameshwari Rameshchandra Daga
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.