SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 694

S.M.GAVHANE
Sham Bhagwanrao Ingale – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil M Gaikwad, Adv., S.N. Morampalle, Adv., Ganesh R Jadhav, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

S.M. GAVHANE, J.

1. Heard, the appeal is admitted. Notice after admission is made returnable forthwith. Appeal is taken up for final hearing with the consent of both sides.

2. By this appeal the appellants/accused Nos.1 and 2 have assailed order dated 30/11/2018 in Misc. Criminal Application No.894 of 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nanded, thereby rejecting said application of the appellants for anticipatory bail. By order dated 15/01/2019 interim protection that, "no coercive action be taken against the appellants till the next date", was granted and it was continued from time to time.

3. Facts relevant to decide this appeal, in short, are that respondent No.2-Vanita Dhanaji Marakwad has filed the complaint with Vazirabad Police Station against the appellants and on the basis of the said complaint Crime No.333/2018 came to be registered against the appellants on 04/11/2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(r) (s), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the "Atrocities Act") and under Sections 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short "IPC














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top