RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, J.

1. On 02/04/2019, after hearing the learned Advocate for the petitioner, the learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and the learned Advocate for respondent No.5, I had passed the following order :-

"1. I have heard the learned Advocates for the petitioner, the learned AGP on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 and on behalf of respondent No.5.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the concurrent findings dated 26/12/2016 delivered by the District Registrar, Money Lending and dated 12/06/2017 delivered by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, which is the Appellate Authority.

3. The learned Advocate for the petitioner has strenuously criticized the impugned orders. Contention is that he had purchased the land admeasuring 5 R from Gat No.513 at Village Dhekari by a registered sale deed dated 02/09/2005. The petitioner paid Rs.1,00,000/- to respondent No.5 while reducing the sale deed into writing on 02/09/2005. For one year, the petitioner was to use the land and respondent No.1 was to utilize an amount of Rs.1,00,000/-, which he would return within one year to the petitioner.

4. The petitioner further contends that after one year, as respondent no