SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 911

SANDEEP K.SHINDE
Sandeep Ramesh Solanki – Appellant
Versus
Shevanti Dadoba Nashte – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M. Kulkarni, Adv., S.S. Shah, Adv., Datta H Pawar, Adv., P.P. Kulkarni, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep K Shinde, J.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of the parties, petition is taken up for the final hearing.

2. Petitioners' application under Order I Rule 10(2) of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 in Special Civil Suit No. 361 of 2000 instituted by the respondents no. 1 and 2 has been rejected by the Learned Court on 18.11.2017, against which, this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is preferred. Special Civil Suit No. 361 of 2000 is instituted by the respondents no. 1 and 2 (hereinafter called 'plaintiffs') against respondents no. 3 to 7 (hereinafter called 'defendants') for specific performance of agreement dated 14.08.1999 executed by the defendants no. 1 to 4 in respect of the suit plot. The suit plot is owned by the Sanyukt Maharashtra Cooperative Housing Society ('Society' for short) of which respondents no. 1 and 2 were members and allottees. Thus, Society is defendant no. 5 in the suit as "proper party". Pending suit, the respondents no. 3 and 4 surrendered the suit plot to the Society and thereafter the society executed a lease on 08.03.2004 of the suit plot in favour of the petitioners to which respondents no. 3 and 4 were c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top