SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 1326

S.S.SHINDE
Sachin Ramu Gawli – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra (At the instance of Mulund Police Station) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Prashant Pandey
For the Respondent: Mrs. M.R. Tidke, APP

JUDGMENT :

1. Rule. Rule made returnable and heard with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. Brief facts leading for filing the present application are as under:

The husband of first informant namely Umesh Bombale has committed suicide on 28.09.2014 due to the insulting treatment and threats by the accused persons for recovery of money from him. It is alleged by first informant Sunita Bombale that her husband Umesh was having business of selling cutlery on the footpath. The said Umesh has started some 'Bhishi' by collecting money from persons of their community. As Umesh was illiterate his cousin brother Pradip Bhaskar Bombale used to look after the accounts of the Bhishi. Many of the Bhishi members took the money and ran away and avoided to make the contribution and therefore, Umesh was required to take loan. Accused No. 1 Gurunath Gawli has given amounts to Umesh from time to time and as such, Umesh has borrowed total Rs. 18 lacs from accused no. 1. Similarly, he also borrowed Rs. 10 lacs from another accused Sachin Gawli. However, Umesh could not repay said loan along with the interest to the accused persons. Hence, about 34 months prior to committing su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top