AKIL KURESHI, S.J.KATHAWALLA
Shailaja R. Khanvilkar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.
1. This Writ Petition impugns a circular dated 4th January,2018 issued by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ("BPCL") / Respondent No.3 ("Impugned Circular") and a communication dated 13th March,2018 addressed pursuant to the Impugned Circular ("Impugned Communication").
2. Prior to dealing with the respective arguments canvassed by the parties, it would be necessary to set-out the following :
2.2 The Distributorship Agreements do not prescribe any maximum number of cylinders that can be supplied. However, since earlier there was a shortage of LPG cylinders and people had to wait for a long time to get the LPG connection, BPCL from time to time issued Circulars prescribing ceiling limits ("refill ceiling limits"). The said refill ceiling limits were increased from time to time.
2.3 Since l
APM Terminals B.V. Vs. Union of India & Anr.
Bajaj Hindustan Ltd. Vs. Sri Shadilal Enterprises Ltd. & Anr.
Crabb v. Arun District Council
Evenden v. Guildford City Association Football Club Ltd
Federation of Railway Association Vs. Union of India
M/s. Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Company Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Madras City Wine Merchants Association Vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
Municipal Corporation of Ujjain Vs. BVG India Limited
PTR Exports (Madras) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Punjab Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. International Airport Authority of India & Ors.
Tata Cellular Vs. Union of India
Union of India & Ors. Vs. Godfrey Phillips India Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.