S.C.GUPTE
Bajaj Electricals Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bajaj Electrical Kamgar Sanghatana, Pune – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.C. Gupte, J. - This petition challenges an order passed by the Industrial Court at Pune allowing a complaint of unfair labour practice. The complaint, filed by the Respondent union, challenged a notice of closure given by the Petitioner management. By this notice, one of the two divisions of the company at its factory at Chakan, Pune, namely, diecasting division, was proposed to be closed. It was the case of the Respondent union that this closure was sham and was, in fact, an illegal lockout amounting to an unfair labour practice under Item 6 of Schedule II and also under Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 ("PULP Act").
2. It is the case of the Petitioner management that at its Chakan factory, it had two distinct undertakings, namely, the diecasting factory and the fan factory. The two factories, called divisions, were located in separate premises and buildings though within the same complex. The diecasting division employed about 34 workmen. There was no interchange or transfer of workmen from one division to another; the diecasting division had separate machinery which was not
Associated Cement Companies Ltd. (Chaibasa Cement Works, Jhinkpani) Vs. Their Workmen.
Isha Steel Treatment, Bombay Vs. Association of Engineering Workers, Bombay
S.B. Patole Vs. Fujitsu ICIM Ltd.
S.G. Chemicals and Dyes Trading Employees Union Vs. S.G. Chemicals and Dyes Trading Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.