S.B.SHUKRE, S.M.MODAK
K. M. Refineries and Infraspace Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.B. SHUKRE, J.
1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent.
2. The facts of this Petition appear on quite a narrow canvass. Suffice it to say, for the purposes of this Petition that the Petitioner-a registered Company dealing in manufacture of Vegetable Oil and Allied Oil products, fired by the enthusiasm created by the Government scheme intending to have industries at disperse places all over Maharashtra under ‘New Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993’ (for short ‘Incentive Scheme’) set up a factory unit at village Dabha, Tahil Nandgaon Khandeshwar, District Amravati with the hope that the incentives offered under the Incentive Scheme would offset the increased cost of production and the Petitioner would be able to compete with other similar industries in marketing its products at affordable rates, without causing any loss to the Petitioner- Company.
3. Under the Incentive Scheme, monetary and other incentives in the nature of tax subsidy or tax exemption at the rates prescribed in the scheme and other benefits were given. The document of Incentive Scheme required that the Eligibility Certificate be issued by the Implementing Agency and invariabl
Centre of Legal Research vs. State of Kerala
Collector of Bombay vs. Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay
Gujarat State Financial Corporation vs. M/s. Lotus Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (1983) 3 SCC 379
Keshavananda vs. State of Kerala
M/s. Motiram Padampat Sugar Mills Company Limited vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Tinsukhia Electric Supply Co. Ltd. vs. State of Assam and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.