Back
V.L.ACHLIYA
Bharati – Appellant
Versus
Sultan Singh Aparsingh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. aggrieved party seeks enhancement of compensation (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. claimants present evidence of financial dependency (Para 5 , 30) |
| 3. counsel argues inadequacy of compensation awarded (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 29) |
| 4. court analyzes evidence and past cases to determine compensation (Para 18 , 28) |
| 5. judgment enhances compensation awarded by the tribunal (Para 38) |
JUDGMENT
V.L. Achliya, J. - Being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and award dated 16.08.2004 passed by the Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar in Motor Accident Claims Petition No.822/2000, the appellants (original claimants) have preferred this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.
2. For the sake of brevity and convenience, the parties to appeal are referred as they are referred and described in the impugned judgment.
3. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel representing respondent no.2. Perused the record and proceedings.
4. The appellants-claimants herein had filed application under section 166 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 (Hereinafter referred to as "the M.V. Act"), seeking compensation of Rs.11,00,000/- on account of accidental death of deceased Rameshlal Kisan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
