DIPAK MISRA, A. K. SIKRI, A. M. KHANWILKAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, ASHOK BHUSHAN
National Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Pranay Sethi – Respondent
The judgment provides standardized guidelines for deductions towards personal and living expenses of the deceased when determining the multiplicand (net income for loss of dependency) in motor accident death claims under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Deduct 1/5 (20%) if more than 6 dependent family members. (!) (!) (!)
For bachelor deceased (typically parents as claimants):
Exception: If large dependent family (e.g., widowed mother + many non-earning siblings), restrict to 1/3. (!) (!) (!) (!)
General principles:
These rules promote uniformity and consistency, applied after proving age, income, and dependants, alongside multiplier and future prospects. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
JUDGMENT :
Dipak Misra, CJI.
Perceiving cleavage of opinion between Reshma Kumari and others v. Madan Mohan and another, (2013) 9 SCC 65 and Rajesh and others v. Rajbir Singh and others, (2013) 9 SCC 54 both three-Judge Bench decisions, a two-Judge Bench of this Court in National Insurance Company Limited v. Pushpa and others, (2015) 9 SCC 166 thought it appropriate to refer the matter to a larger Bench for an authoritative pronouncement, and that is how the matters have been placed before us.
2. In the course of deliberation we will be required to travel backwards covering a span of two decades and three years and may be slightly more and thereafter focus on the axis of the controversy, that is, the decision in Sarla Verma and others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and another, (2009) 6 SCC 121 wherein the two- Judge Bench made a sanguine endeavour to simplify the determination of claims by specifying certain parameters.
3. Before we penetrate into the past, it is necessary to note what has been stated in Reshma Kumari (supra) and Rajesh’s case. In Reshma Kumari the three-Judge Bench was answering the reference made in Reshma Kumari and others v. Madan Mohan and another, (2009) 13 SCC
National Insurance Company Limited v. Pushpa
Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation
Abati Bezbaruah v. Dy. Director General, Geological Survey of India
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Trilok Chandra
Supe Dei v. National Insurance Company Limited
United India Insurance Co. Ltd v. Patricia Jean Mahajan
Deepal Girishbhai Soni v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. Charlie
Santosh Devi v. National Insurance Company Limited
State of Bihar v. Kalika Kuer alias Kalika Singh
G.L. Batra v. State of Haryana
Union of India v. Godfrey Philips India Ltd.
Sundarjas Kanyalal Bhatija v. Collector, Thane, Maharashtra
Tribhovandas Purshottamdas Thakkar v. Ratilal Motilal Patel
Madras Bar Association v. Union of India
Union of India v. Madras Bar Association
Pradip Chandra Parija v. Pramod Chandra Patnaik
Chandra Prakash v. State of U.P.
Sandhya Educational Society v. Union of India
Munna Lal Jain v. Vipin Kumar Sharma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.