R.D.DHANUKA, V.G.BISHT
Runwal Constructions – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through its Ministry of Defence, New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
V.G. BISHT, J.
1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent of parties, Petition is heard finally.
2. By this Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the Communications dated 14th March, 2017, June 2018, 6th July, 2018 and 5th October, 2018 issued by the respondent no. 2 refusing to grant of NOC to it for construction of their building, letter dated 27th August, 2019 issued by the respondent no. 5-Thane Municipal Corporation (herein-after referred to as “TMC”) directing the petitioner to obtain NOC from the Indian Air Force Station, Thane.
3. Brief facts are as under:
4. By and under an Agreement for Development dated 29th December, 2005 made between the Bombay Wire Ropes Limited, Warden Synplast Private Limited and M/s Runwal Constructions i.e. the petitioner in respect of the property at Kolshet Road, Thane admeasuring 1,55,697.71 square meters and the same was registered with the Sub-Registrar of Assurances at Thane on 28
Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Babu Varghese and Others vs. Bar Council of Kerela and Others
Hindustan Time and Others vs. State of U.P. and Another
Paul Monoj Pandian vs. P. Veldurai
State of M.P. vs. Thakur Bharat Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.