SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 92

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
R.D. DHANUKA & V.G. BISHT, JJ.
Arun Yashwant Kulkarni – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 96919 of 2020
Decided On : 16-02-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Satish B. Talekar a/w. Madhavi Ayyapan i/b. Talekar & Associates, Advocates
For the Respondents:A.A. Kumbhakoni, A.G. a/w. P.P. Kakade, Government Pleader a/w. Akshay Shinde, “B” Panel Counsel, A.A. Alaspurkar, Advocate, R3, Deelip Patil Bankar, Chief Standing Counsel.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a petitioner to demonstrate legal injury and violation of personal rights to challenge legislative amendments under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Headnote:

Ordinance - Co-operative Societies - Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Section 73AAA(3), Section 73CB(15) - The court discussed the constitutional validity of the provisos to Section 73AAA(3) and Section 73CB(15) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 as inserted by the Maharashtra Ordinance No.XII of 2020. The judgment also highlighted the implications of the amendments on Articles 14, 19(1)(c), 243-ZJ, and 243-ZK of the Constitution of India.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a member of a Co-operative Society, challenged the postponement of elections of Managing Committees of Co-operative Societies in Maharashtra and the continuation of existing members of the Committees after their tenure had expired. The petitioner alleged that the amendments were politically motivated and ultra-vires constitutional provisions.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner failed to demonstrate how the amendments affected any statutory or legal rights, and lacked cause of action and locus standi to challenge the constitutional validity of the impugned Ordinances and Orders. As a result, the writ petition was dismissed.

Issues: The issues revolved around the constitutional validity of the amendments to the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and the petitioner's standing to challenge the amendments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of demonstrating a cause of action and legal injury to challenge legislative amendments, and highlighted the necessity for a petitioner to show violation of personal rights to invoke jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as the petitioner lacked cause of action and locus standi to challenge the impugned Ordinances and Orders.

JUDGMENT :

V.G. Bisht, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, heard finally at the stage of admission.

2. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has approached this Court with following prayers :

    “PRAYERS

A. To hold and declare that proviso to Section 73AAA (3) and proviso to Section 73(CB)(15) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 as inserted by the Maharashtra Ordinance No.XII of 2020 (Exhibit “K”) is ultra-vires Articles 14, 19(1) (c), 243-ZJ and 243ZK of the Constitution of India;

B. To direct the respondents to appoint administrators or Committee of Administrators to manage the affairs of all such cooperative societies in Maharashtra terms of which have expired, by issuing a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, as the case may be;

C. To quash the impugned order dated 17.06.2020 issued by the Under-Secretary, Cooperation, Marketing and Textiles Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 (Exhibit “J”), by issuing a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, as the case may be.

G. To hold and declare that proviso to Section 73AAA(3) and proviso to Section 73CB(15) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 as inserted by the Maharashtra Ordinance No.XII of 2020 (Exhibit “N”) is ultra-vires Articles 14, 19(1) (c), 243-ZJ and 243-ZK of the Constitution of India.”

3. The petitioner claims to be a member of Balgawade Vividh Karyakari Sahakari (Vikas) Seva Society, Balgawade, Talukar Tasgaon, District Sangli. The said Vividh Karyakari Sahakari (Vikas) Seva Society, Balgawade is affiliated to Sangli District Central Co-operative Bank, Sangli. It is the case of petitioner that he has been actively involved in social service since 1972. According to him there are about 35,000 Cooperative Societies including Cooperative Sugar Factories (SSKs), Cooperative Ginning Mills, District Central Cooperative Banks (DCCBs) and multipurpose Cooperative Credit Societies at village level in the State of Maharashtra.

4. The elections of Managing Committees of the Cooperative Societies including SSKs, DCCBs, Primary Agricultural Cooperative Societies at village level including 22 District Central Cooperative Banks were due by the end of January 2020. The State of Maharashtra in its Department of Cooperation, Marketing and Textiles issued two orders on 27th January 2020 (Exh. C) and 31st January 2020 (Exh. D) postponing elections of Managing Committees of all such Cooperative Societies which were due for elections in exercise of powers under Section 157 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”).

5. According to the petitioner, the Government Orders dated 27th January 2020 and 31st January 2020 were challenged as the same were contrary to the spirit of Articles 243-ZJ and 243- ZK and also on the ground of those orders being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19(1)(c) and at the same time ultra-vires Article 14 of the Constitution of India. This Court (Aurangabad Bench) vide order dated 11th March 2020 quashed and set aside the said orders passed by the respondent no.1 holding them to be illegal, arbitrary and ultra-vires the constitutional provisions embodied in Articles 243-ZJ and 243-ZK of the Constitution of India as well as Sections 73CC and 157 of the said Act.

6. Meanwhile, the Government introduced a Bill (Exh. F) on 2nd March 2020 in the State Legislature so as to amend Section 73CC to enable postponement of the elections of the Managing Committees of Co-operative Societies in the State of Maharashtra including the District Central Co-operative Banks, Primary Agricultural Credit Societies and Co-operative Sugar Factories. However, none of the grounds or exigencies mentioned in the Statement of Objects and Reasons such as scarcity, drought, flood, fire or any other natural calamity were available on 2nd March 2020. As such, there was no

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top