DIPANKAR DATTA, RAVINDRA V.GHUGE
Drushti Engineers and Developers – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, through its Secretary, Ministry of Textiles – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.
2. By this petition, the petitioner has putforth prayer clauses A, B and C as under:
(B) That this Hon’ble court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondents thereby directing to conclude the sale proceedings in respect of free hold land – Taxi stand, bearing City Survey No.20666 of Aurangabad Textile Mills, Aurangabad, which were initiated pursuant to the E-tender dtd. 24.2.2011 and for that purpose issue necessary directions.
(C) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Writ Petition, respondents be restrained by an order of injunction from creating any third
AI Champdany Industries Ltd. vs. Official Liquidator and Another
Delhi Development Authority vs. Kenneth Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority vs. Raghu Nath Gupta
UT Chandigarh Administration and Another v. Amerjeet Singh and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.