P.D.SAWARKAR
Shirur Municipality – Appellant
Versus
Its Workmen – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This industrial dispute has been referred to me under S. 10(1)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act by the Labour and Social Welfare Department Order No. A.J.C. 24(2) of 1958 dated 31 July 1958. The demands of the workmen will be reproduced in due course.
2. To the statement of claim of the workmen the municipality filed its written statement on 1 November 1958. Then on 16 February, 1959 the municipality sought permission to file an additional written statement. The permission having been granted, an additional written statement was filed on the same day. There a preliminary objection has been raised by the municipality to the maintainability of the reference. This is how the objection is worded:-
3. Sri Lalit, advocate for the municipality, and Sri J.V. Bhave for the workmen, advanced argument
Baroda Borough Municipality vs. Its Workmen
Corporation of the City of Nagpur vs. N.J. Mujumdar
D.N. Banerjee vs. P.R. Mukherjee
Mahant Sri Jagannath Ramanuj Das and Another vs. State of Orissa and Another
Ratilal Panachand Gandhi vs. State of Bombay and Others
Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate vs. The Management of Dimakuchi Tea Estate
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.