Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Satish L. Maneshinde a/w. Anandini Fernandes, Namita Maneshinde & Nikhil Maneshinde.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anil C. Singh, Additional Solicitor General a/w. Sandesh Patil, Shreeram Shirsat, D.P. Singh, Amogh Singh, Aditya Thakkar, Pavan Patil, Ms. Apurva Gupte, Chintan Shah, Mayur Jaisingh, Mr. Swapnil S. Pednekar, A.P.P.

Based on the provided legal document, the classification of the offences under the NDPS Act indicates that all offences under this Act are generally non-bailable. The provisions of the NDPS Act, particularly after amendments, explicitly state that offences punishable under the Act shall be cognizable and non-bailable, with stringent conditions for grant of bail. The law emphasizes that the offences are serious and require careful judicial scrutiny before bail can be granted, especially when involving larger quantities or specific offences such as those under Section 27A or involving commercial quantities.

Furthermore, the specific conditions for bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act require the court to be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty and that they are not likely to commit any offence while on bail. The Act's language and amendments reinforce that all offences under the NDPS Act are non-bailable unless exceptional circumstances are established, and the court's satisfaction is a prerequisite for granting bail.

In summary, the offences under the NDPS Act are generally considered non-bailable, and bail is granted only under strict conditions and after careful judicial consideration of the specific facts and circumstances of each case.