R.G.AVACHAT
Prakash Vitthal Kale – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra Pulse Mills – Respondent
ORDER :
R.G. Avachat, J.
1. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated 25.02.2014 passed by 6th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jalgaon, below application, Exhibit-179 in Regular Darkhast No. 152 of 2012 (Special Darkhast No. 2 of 1978). By the impugned order, the respondent herein (decree holder) has been allowed to deposit Rs. 42,000/-, petitioner No. 1 (deceased)-original Judgment Debtor has been directed to execute sale deed and in the event of his failing to do so, the respondent-decree holder were given liberty to get executed the sale deed through Court.
BRIEF RESUME OF FACTS:
2. The respondent, partnership firm, filed a suit being Special Civil Suit No. 4 of 1975 for specific performance of agreement for sale against petitioner No. 1. On 30.07.1977, the suit was decreed. The respondent/firm filed proceedings (Regular Darkhast No. 2 of 1978) for execution of the decree on 06.02.1978. The petitioner/judgment debtor preferred First Appeal (295 of 1978). The same came to be dismissed on 23.06.1982. Under the decree, the petitioner/judgment debtor was directed to obtain Non-Agriculture (N.A.) permission from the concerned authority within a period of two months an
V.S. Palanichamy Chettiar Firm v. C. Alagappan and am.
Bhupinder Kumar v. Angrej Singh
Prem Jeevan v. K.S. Venkata Raman and anr.
Ravi Setia v. Madan Lal and ors.
Azhar Sultana v. B. Rajamani and ors.
Hari s/o. Ramji v. Mahadu s/o. Kerba Tekale died through L.Rs. Shivaji Mahadu Tekale and ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.