JUDGMENT :

N.B. Suryawanshi, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard with the consent of parties.

2. This petition takes exception to the judgment and order passed by Industrial Tribunal, Jalna, in Complaint (ULP) No. 112/2017, thereby allowing the complaint.

3. The facts in brief, without unnecessary details are as follows:-

The Petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the manufacturing process of automotive chains, sprockets and chain tensioners under popular brand name 'ROLON'. The Petitioner also manufactures Fine Blanked Products and Precision Machined Gears and Parts. Many workers are employed by the Petitioner to carry out its day to day production activity. The factory of the Petitioner was established in November-2014 and the production activities were commenced on 16.01.2015.

4. The Respondent workmen filed Complaint (ULP) No. 112/2017 contending that they are workmen and the Petitioner is an industry within the meaning of Section 2(s) and (j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short 'Act of 1947') and service conditions of the employees are governed by Model Standing Orders (1950) framed under the Industrial Employment