SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 185

D.A.DESAI, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, V.KHALID
Arkal Govind Raj Rao – Appellant
Versus
Ciba Geigy Of India LTD. Bombay – Respondent


Advocates:
H.S.PARIHAR, Mukul Mudgal, N.B.SHETYE, R.RAMACHANDRAN

Judgment

DESAI, J.:- The appellant Mr. Arkal Govind Raj Rao joined service with M/s. Ciba Geigy of India Ltd. (employer for short) as Stenographer-cum-Accountant with effect from Jan. 18, 1956. On Jan. 1, 1966 he was appointed as Assistant and continued to render service in that post till his services came to be terminated on Oct. 10, 1972. The termination of service led to an industrial dispute being raised and ultimately the Deputy Commissioner Labour (Administration), Bombay made a reference to the Labour Court at Bombay for adjudicating upon the industrial dispute involving the question of the validity and legality of the order of termination of service. The reference also required to Labour Court to enquire whether the appellant is to be re-instated with full back wages and continued in service with effect from Oct. 10, 1972.

2. Numerous preliminary objections were raised by the employer, amongst them being one that the appellant is not a workman within the meaning of the expression in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act for short).

3. Evidence was led by both the parties and numerous documents were placed on record. On appreciation of evidence the Labour Court held that even






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top