SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1025

M.S.SONAK, M.S.JAWALKAR
Sudheer Rikhari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Goa – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shivan Desai, Advocate, Pravin Faldessai, Advocate, K. Venkat Krishna, Advocate

JUDGMENT

M.S. Sonak, J. - Heard Mr. Shivan Desai for the Petitioners and Mr. Pravin Faldessai, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State in all these Petitions.

2. Learned Counsel for the parties agree that all these Petitions raise common issues of law and fact and therefore, can be disposed of by a common Judgment and Order.

3. In these matters, we had directed the impleadment of K. Venkat Krishna, the complainant as Respondent No.3. This matter was adjourned on some occasions to ensure that service is complete on Respondent No.3. Despite service, however, Respondent No.3 has chosen not to appear in these Petitions. The notice/ orders had made it clear that these Petitions would be disposed of finally at the stage of admission itself. The Petitions were taken up for final disposal after service was complete upon Respondent No.3 and even the affidavit to that effect was filed by the Petitioners.

4. The Petitioners are members of an art-rock live performance project known as "Dastaan LIVE". This band performs live on stage and tours India for its performances. The Petitioners cla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top