M.S.SONAK, M.S.JAWALKAR
Sudheer Rikhari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Goa – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M.S. Sonak, J. - Heard Mr. Shivan Desai for the Petitioners and Mr. Pravin Faldessai, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State in all these Petitions.
2. Learned Counsel for the parties agree that all these Petitions raise common issues of law and fact and therefore, can be disposed of by a common Judgment and Order.
3. In these matters, we had directed the impleadment of K. Venkat Krishna, the complainant as Respondent No.3. This matter was adjourned on some occasions to ensure that service is complete on Respondent No.3. Despite service, however, Respondent No.3 has chosen not to appear in these Petitions. The notice/ orders had made it clear that these Petitions would be disposed of finally at the stage of admission itself. The Petitions were taken up for final disposal after service was complete upon Respondent No.3 and even the affidavit to that effect was filed by the Petitioners.
4. The Petitioners are members of an art-rock live performance project known as "Dastaan LIVE". This band performs live on stage and tours India for its performances. The Petitioners cla
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another
Devidas Ramachandra Tuljapurkar vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Indibly Creative Private Limited and Ors. vs. Government of West Bengal and Ors.
Jogindar Kumar vs. State of U.P.
Mahendra Singh Dhoni vs. Yerraguntla Shyamsundar and Ors.
Manzar Sayeed Khan vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.