SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1009

N.J.JAMADAR
Gulabrao Tuljaram Mandge – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Abhijit S More, Advocate, S.B. Pulkundwar, Advocate, V.V. Tarde, Advocate

JUDGMENT

N J Jamadar, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and, with the consent of the Counsels for the parties, heard finally at the stage of admission.

2. This petition calls in question the legality, propriety and correctness of the order passed by the Collector, Ahmednagar in Village Panchayat Dispute No. 101/2015, dated 8 th March 2016, whereby the dispute raised by the petitioner alleging that respondent No. 3 had incurred disqualification under Section 14 (1) (j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 (the Act 1959), as she had more than two children, was dismissed and the order dated 3rd July 2017 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik in Appeal No. 43/2016, whereby the appeal there against also came to be dismissed.

3. The background facts leading to this petition can be stated, in brief, as under :

a) The petitioner is a resident of village Rehkuri, Taluka Karjat. He is a registered voter. Respondent No. 3 contested election to the post of the member of Village Panchayat, from Ward No. 3, reserved for woman (General), and was declared elected. While submitting the nomination form, the petitioner alleged, the respondent No. 3 had furnis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top