SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 904

BHARATI H.DANGRE
Harischandra Panglo – Appellant
Versus
Shambu Dacu – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.B.Dcosta, Advocate, Karishma Betquikar, Advocate, S.D.Lotlikar, Advocate, S.Keny, Advocate, T.Sequeira, Advocate

JUDGMENT

BHARATI H.DANGRE,J. - Heard Mr. M.B. D'Costa, learned Senior Counsel with Advocate Ms. Karishma Betquekar, for the Appellants and Mr. S.D. Lotlikar, learned Senior Counsel with advocate Ms. S. Keny and Mr. T. Sequeira, for the Respondents.

2. The suit property is an agricultural property known as "COLEAN SARVO" or "COLEACHO SODO" and also known as "GAR ROVLU" situated at Bethora, Ponda-Goa and described in Land Registration Officer of Ilhas under no. 13657 of Book B 36 (new) and originally surveyed under old cadastral survey no. 41 and presently surveyed under no. 249/1, 249/2, 250/0, 251/0, 252/1, 253/0, 256/0, 265/2 and 265/3 of village Bethora and bounded as under:

East: By top of hill and boundary of Village Codar.

West: By rivulet.

North: By stone fence of Sheutu Probina.

South: By old Dabal road.

3. The Plaintiffs (Defendants herein) instituted a suit for permanent injunction claiming to be the owners and in possession of the suit property recorded under Land Registration Office under No. 13657 and originally surveyed under Old Cadastral Survey No. 41. They trace their title to the suit property to the Deed of Sale dated 22.09.1975, registered in the Sub-Registrar's O

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top