SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 835

A.S.CHANDURKAR, PUSHPA V.GANEDIWALA
Pashant – Appellant
Versus
Yamini – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shri B.W. Patil, Advocate, for the Appellant / Shri S.A. Sahu, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Pushpa V Ganediwala, J. - This is the husband's appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (hereafter "Act of 1984", for short) challenging the judgment and decree dated 14/06/2017 passed by the Judge, Family Court - 4, Nagpur in Petition No.A-226/2009, thereby dismissed the husband's petition for divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereafter "Act of 1955", for short) on the ground of cruelty.

The facts leading to the filing of the present appeal may be stated as under :

2. The marriage of the appellant/ husband with the respondent/ wife was solemnized on 11/04/2006 at Nagpur. The couple is blessed with one son, viz., Samyak, born on 29/08/2007, who is presently in the custody of the respondent/ wife. After their marriage, the couple started residing in a rented house at Nagpur. The parents of the appellant/ husband were residing in their village. Both the parties are in the profession of teaching.

3. It is the grievance of the appellant/ husband that the respondent/ wife is of arrogant, whimsical and abnormal behavior. He was not informed that she was suffering from the disease Rheumatoid arthritis and hypothyroidism by her parents. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top