SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 619

M.S.SONAK
Raghunath Madhukar Mandrekar – Appellant
Versus
Prabhakar Vernekar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
J. Mulgaonkar, Advocate, Parikshit Sawant, Advocate, Vishnuprasad Lawande, Advocate

JUDGMENT

M S Sonak, J. - Heard Mr. J.J. Mulgaonkar for the Applicants, Mr. Parikshit Sawant for Respondent No.1 and Mr. V.A. Lawande for Respondents 2(b) to 2(f).

2. These are applications seeking appointment of an arbitrator since the disputes have arisen between the parties in connection with the agreements entered into between the parties which, admittedly, contain an arbitration clause.

3. On 22nd January, 2021, after hearing the parties, the following order was made :

" Heard Mr. J. Mulgaonkar for the Applicants, Mr. Parikshit Sawant for Respondent no.1, and Mr. Vishnuprasad Lawande for Respondents no.2(b), 2(c), 2(d), 2(e), and 2(f).

2. Mr. Mulgaonkar, learned counsel for the applicants submits that all the respondents have been duly served. Today, Mr. Sawant and Mr. Lawande appear on behalf of some of the respondents and oppose these applications seeking the appointment of an arbitrator.

3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the facts involved in all these applications are similar and therefore, there will be no difficulty in disposing of all these applications by a common order. Application for appointment of arbitrator no.2/2018 made by Shri Raghunath Mandrekar is trea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top