SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1590

MANGESH S.PATIL
Priyanka – Appellant
Versus
Amit – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mane, Advocate, Umesh Bodkhe, Advocate, S.S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Mangesh S. Patil, J. - Heard. Rule. The Rule is made returnable forthwith. Learned advocate for the respondent waives service. At the request of both the sides the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission.

2. The question that arises for determination by this Court is as to whether in a proceeding for divorce instituted by the respondent-husband on the ground of desertion under Section 13(1)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter 'the Act') when the parties i.e. petitioner-wife and the respondent-husband have settled the terms of compromise before the marriage counsellor inter alia agreeing to obtain a divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Act he can be permitted to withdraw the consent. The issue arises from following facts :

(i) The parties solemnized the marriage on 24.04.2012. Due to matrimonial dispute they started living separately since March 2013. Respondent-husband instituted a petition for divorce on the ground of desertion under Section 13(1)(i-b) of the Act. The parties appeared before a marriage counsellor and settled the terms which were filed before the Family Court at Exh. 7 (Exh. 'C' of the Writ Petition). The learned Judge p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top