SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1272

V.K.JADHAV, SHRIKANT D.KULKARNI
Hafizur Rahman Sheikh – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SHRIKANT D.KULKARNI, J. - Heard finally at admission stage with consent of both the sides.

2. By this application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the applicant is seeking relief of quashing of F.I.R. vide C.R.No.31 of 2020, registered with Basamba Police Station, District Hingoli, for the offences punishable under Sections 306, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Keshav Babhnaji Wankhede (since deceased) was serving as Police Constable in Mumbai Police. Gayatri Keshav Wankhede/respondent no.2 (first informant) happened to be his wife. Keshav along with his friends Suhas Bhise, Rahul Bhise, Vinod Patil, Satish Chavan, one Mr. Talbhandare and Sunil Shirke had purchased one plot each in the year 2008 at village Devat near Panvel. They sold their respective plots and they had purchased two acres of land at village Vihighar from Mr Shailesh Dawda (accused no.2).

4. During this time, deceased met with applicant. The applicant informed the deceased that he was willing to purchase adjoining land and further shown readiness to make construction thereon together. Mr Shailesh Dawda played role as a broker and took Rs.7 lakhs from them. The applicant has paid Rs.1 Crore

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top