JUDGMENT

M.S.KARNIK,J. - I start with a narration which may not be completely relevant in the context of deciding the present issue. I express this with a fond hope that the warring couple resolve their disputes amicably and at the earliest keeping in mind that apart from the hardships the parties are facing, it is their minor son 'Ridaan ' who is worst affected by this unfortunate estrangement. 'Ridaan ' is already a subject matter of a parenting agreement. Whether it be in the Foreign Court or the Indian Court, the parties must try to resolve the marital dispute amicably. I have no manner of doubt that the parties will put 'Ridaan 's interest above everything else and find an early resolution to the dispute.

FACTS OF THE CASE

2. The husband prays for an anti suit injunction restraining the respondent - wife from instituting proceedings for divorce and other matrimonial disputes before the Foreign Court.

3. These proceedings are an outcome of an unfortunate marital discord between the couple. The couple married in Mumbai on 30/11/2004 as per the Hindu Rites and Customs. For a major part, as the pleadings record, the couple stayed abroad in different countries for job related assign