BHARATI DANGRE
Edyma Siregar – Appellant
Versus
V. V. Satardekar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This Appeal is preferred by the Appellant, an Indonesian National assailing the judgment and order dated 19/08/2015 passed by the Special Judge in N.D.P.S. Special Case No.21 of 2013 thereby convicting and subjecting her to undergo sentence on such conviction. By the impugned judgment, the Appellant stands convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) read with Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ("NDPS Act") and sentenced to undergo RI for a term of 14 years and to pay fine of Rs.1 lakh, in default, to undergo SI for one year. The Appellant is also convicted for offences under Section 23 read with Section 28 of the NDPS Act and has been sentenced to undergo RI for 16 years and to pay fine of Rs.1 lakh, in default, to suffer SI for one year. The substantive sentences on both counts are directed to run concurrently.
The Appellant was found in possession of 3.930 kgs. Of Methamphetamine, a psychotropic substance in contravention of provisions of the NDPS Act and was therefore tried for commission of offences punishable under relevant provisions of the NDPS Act.
2. The prosecution case can be aphoristicly stated as under:-
(
Darshan Singh V. State of Haryana
G. Srinivas Goud V. State of A.P
Karnail Singh V. State of Haryana
Mohan Lal V. State of Rajasthan
Narayanaswamy Ravishankar V. Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Raj Kumar Singh @ Raju @ Batya V. State of Rajasthan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.