SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1049

BHARATI DANGRE
Edyma Siregar – Appellant
Versus
V. V. Satardekar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P. Rajgopal, Advocate, Drishti Shah, Advocate, Rekha Rajgopal, Advocate, Anuradha A. Mane, Advocate, H.J. Dedhia, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. This Appeal is preferred by the Appellant, an Indonesian National assailing the judgment and order dated 19/08/2015 passed by the Special Judge in N.D.P.S. Special Case No.21 of 2013 thereby convicting and subjecting her to undergo sentence on such conviction. By the impugned judgment, the Appellant stands convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) read with Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ("NDPS Act") and sentenced to undergo RI for a term of 14 years and to pay fine of Rs.1 lakh, in default, to undergo SI for one year. The Appellant is also convicted for offences under Section 23 read with Section 28 of the NDPS Act and has been sentenced to undergo RI for 16 years and to pay fine of Rs.1 lakh, in default, to suffer SI for one year. The substantive sentences on both counts are directed to run concurrently.

The Appellant was found in possession of 3.930 kgs. Of Methamphetamine, a psychotropic substance in contravention of provisions of the NDPS Act and was therefore tried for commission of offences punishable under relevant provisions of the NDPS Act.

2. The prosecution case can be aphoristicly stated as under:-

(

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top