G. P. MATHUR, P. K. BALASUBRAMANYAN
State Of H. P. With State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Pawan Kumar With Bhanwar Lal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G.P. Mathur, J.—
Criminal Appeal No. 222 of 1997
1. In view of difference of opinion between two learned Judges who heard the appeal, the matter has been placed before this larger bench and the question for consideration is whether the safeguards provided by Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘the NDPS Act’ or ‘the Act’) regarding search of any “person” would also apply to any bag, briefcase or any such article or container etc., which is being carried by him.
2. The essential facts of the case, which are necessary for decision of the appeal, may be stated in brief. According to the case of the prosecution, Hukum Singh and Munshi Ram, Head Constables and some police personnel were checking buses at the bus stand, Mandi in the night of 18.7.1994. While checking a bus at about 8.45 p.m., they noticed that the accused Pawan Kumar (respondent herein), who was carrying a bag, Ex. P3, slipped out from the rear door of the bus and thereafter started running towards Subzi Mandi side. The police personnel got suspicious and after a chase apprehended him near the gate of bus stand. They felt smell of opium emitting from the bag and, theref
Saikou Jabbi v. State of Maharashtra
Jugalkishore Saraf v. M/s. Raw Cotton Co. Ltd.
State of Maharashtra v. Natwarlal Damodardas Soni
Namdi Francis Nwazor v. Union of India and Anr.
Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri v. State of Gujarat
Gurbax Singh v. State of Haryana
State of Punjab v. Makhan Singh
Birakishore Kar v. State of Orissa
Krishna Kanwar v. State of Rajasthan
State v. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.