SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1060

N.J.JAMADAR
Pradeep Vinayakrao Patil – Appellant
Versus
Abhay Yuva Kalyan Kendra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ajay S Deshpande, Advocate, R.D. Sanap, Advocate, Sachin S Deshmukh, Advocate, A.B. Girase, Advocate

JUDGMENT

N J Jamadar, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and with the consent of the counsel for the parties heard finally at the stage of admission.

2. These petitions arise out of a common judgment and order passed by the learned Presiding Officer, University and College Tribunal, Aurangabad in Misc. Application No. 1 of 2019 (in Appeal No. MMU-14/1998) and Mis. Application No. 2 of 2019 (in Appeal No. 16 of 1998) dated 01-12-2020. The writ petition Nos. 1113 of 2021 and 1114 of 2021 are preferred by the employers. The writ petition No. 307 of 2021 is preferred by the employees, who are contesting respondents in petitions preferred by the employers. Hence, all these petitions are decided by this common judgment.

3. The petitions arise in the backdrop of the following facts.

A] The petitioner No.1-Abhay Yuva Kalyan Kendra's is a public charitable trust. It runs Abhay Yuva Kalyan Kendra the College of Physical Education (petitioner No.2) (the employers). Mr. Pradeep Patil and Mr. Ravindra Wagh (the employees) were appointed as Lecturers in the college of Physical Education by the appointment order dated 09-10-1991 and 03-09-1990, respectively. The employees were appointed to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top