SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 597

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
Adi Burjor Banaji & Others - Plaintiffs
Versus
Bakhtawar Maneksha Jijina & Others - Defendants
Suit Nos. 236, 2546 of 2014
Decided On : 22-03-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiffs : Mr. Karl F. Tamboly, along with Mr. J.N. Mistry, Ms. Vijaya Bhat, Ms. Avan Ardeshir, instructed by M/s. Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe.
For the Defendants : Ms. Sapna Khobragade, Ms. Gayatri Nayak, Mr. Raj Gupta i/by Mr. Rajesh Khobragade.

Headnote:

Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Trust - Notice of Motion - Seeking interim reliefs - Plaintiffs are the present Trustees - Trust is a public charitable trust registered under registration no. C–418/B with office of Charity Commissioner, under the provisions of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 - In the year, Banaji family of Mumbai established a Parsi Fire Temple called the Banaji Limji Agiary (‘the Agiary’) at Banaji Street, Fort - A chawl was built adjacent to the Agiary - In year, Agiary and chawl were found to be in a dilapidated condition and were pulled down and restored by members of Banaji Family - A sum of Rs.23,000/- was raised by the members of the Banaji Family for restoration and endowment of Agiary - After work of restoration of the Agiary was completed, a sum remained out of the aforesaid funds raised for restoration of the Agiary - Members of Banaji Family decided to form a trust and to place the immovable properties and funds in its care - Whether they are being referred to in the context of the High Court Suit or the City Civil Court Suit – Held, Its provisions were never meant to act as a curb upon the normal powers of trustees in matter of instituting suits - Judgment would be applicable to facts of present case where Plaintiffs have instituted High Court Suit in their capacity as Trustees of Trust to protect the Suit Properties from Defendant who is a third party claiming an adverse interest therein - It is clarified that injunction granted as per prayer clause (d) (i) above will not come in way of Defendant accessing the individual tenements in her possession in Banaji Mansion, subject of course to outcome of the tress-pass action filed by Plaintiffs against her in respect of the same - Learned Advocates appearing for parties have made a request that Prothonotary be directed to handover to them original documents tendered by them in Court in these Suits upon them replacing same by copies authenticated by respective Advocates and also furnishing undertakings to effect that they shall produce originals as and when called upon by Court to do so - Ordered accordingly.

JUDGMENT :

1. The present Judgment shall dispose of Suit No. 236 of 2014 filed before this Court (‘the High Court Suit’), as well as S.C. Suit No.2546 of 2011 which was originally filed before the Bombay City Civil Court at Bombay (‘the City Civil Court Suit’). The Plaintiffs in the High Court Suit had filed Notice of Motion No. 428 of 2014 seeking interim reliefs during the pendency of the High Court Suit. During the hearing of that Notice of Motion, both sides had consented to both the High Court Suit and the City Civil Court Suit being tried and heard together. Accordingly, by my order dated 15th April 2014 passed in Notice of Motion No. 428 of 2014 in the High Court Suit, the Office of this Court was directed to call for the record and proceedings in the City Civil Court Suit to this Court. Pursuant thereto, the record and proceedings in the City Civil Court Suit was transferred to this Court, and both Suits have thereafter been tried and heard together.

2. The Plaintiffs in the High Court Suit are the Trustees of the Banaji Limji Agiary Trust (‘the Trust’), which is a public charitable trust registered under the provisions of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The Defendant in the High Court Suit is Ms. Bakhtawar Maneksha Jijina. Ms. Jijina is the Plaintiff in the City Civil Court Suit. Plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 in the High Court Suit have been arrayed as Defendant Nos. 1A and 2A in the City Civil Court Suit. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall hereinafter be referred to as they have been arrayed in the High Court Suit, i.e. the Trustees of the Trust shall be referred to as the Plaintiffs, and Ms. Bakhtawar Maneksha Jijina shall be referred to as the Defendant, irrespective of whether they are being referred to in the context of the High Court Suit or the City Civil Court Suit.

3. The case of the Plaintiffs in the High Court Suit is briefly set out as follows :

3.1 The Plaintiffs are the present Trustees of the Banaji Limji Agiary Trust (‘the Trust’). The Trust is a public charitable trust registered under registration no. C–418/B with the office of the Charity Commissioner, under the provisions of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

3.2 In the year 1709, the Banaji family of Mumbai established a Parsi Fire Temple called the Banaji Limji Agiary (‘the Agiary’) at Banaji Street, Fort, Mumbai 400 001. A chawl was built adjacent to the Agiary.

3.3 In the year 1843, the Agiary and chawl were found to be in a dilapidated condition and were pulled down and restored by members of the Banaji Family. A sum of Rs.23,000/- was raised by the members of the Banaji Family for restoration and endowment of the Agiary. After the work of restoration of the Agiary was completed, a sum of Rs.11,034/- remained out of the aforesaid funds raised for restoration of the Agiary. The members of the Banaji Family decided to form a trust and to place the immovable properties and funds in its care.

3.4 On 13th February 1855, a meeting was convened amongst the members of the Banaji Family and the following persons were appointed as Trustees in respect of the movable and immovable properties and the funds, viz., Dadabhoy Rustomjee Banaji, Sorabjee Pestonjee Banaji, Limji Maneckjee Banajee, Dhunjibhoy Framjee and Hormusji Ruttonjee Banaji. Thereafter these persons took charge of the Agiary, chawl and surplus monies mentioned above. Dhunjibhoy Framjee resigned as a Trustee in the year 1864. Hormusji Ruttonjee Banaji died on 26th December 1865. Pestonjee Burjorjee Davur and Nanabhoy Dhunjeebhoy Banajee were appointed as Trustees in their place and stead respectively.

3.5 By a Consent Decree dated 18th January 1877 passed by the Bombay High Court in Suit No. 525 of 1876, the Trustees were to meet within three months and execute a Trust Deed by which t

                                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                        1
                                        2
                                        3
                                        4
                                        5
                                        6
                                        7
                                        8
                                        9
                                        10
                                        11
                                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                        supreme today icon
                                        logo-black

                                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                        Please visit our Training & Support
                                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                        qr

                                        Scan Me!

                                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                        whatsapp-icon Back to top