S.J.KATHAWALLA, MILIND N.JADHAV
Shahed Kamal – Appellant
Versus
Pagarani Universal Infrastructure Private Limited, formerly known as A. Surti Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The challenge in the present Appeal is based on the interplay between two statutes viz. the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 (‘MOFA’) and the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Act, 1974 (“MMRDA Act”).
2. The reliefs sought by the Appellants/Original Plaintiffs are based on enforcement of statutory rights that they claim by application of MOFA on Plot No. 288/B, at Amrut Nagar, Bandivali Village, Jogeshwari (West), Mumbai - 400 102 (“the Suit Plot”). The Respondent No.1/Original Defendant No.1, being the Developer, and Respondent No.8/Original Defendant No.8 i.e. Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (“MMRDA”), dispute these rights inter alia on the basis that the provisions of MOFA are expressly excluded in respect of any land or building belonging to or vesting in MMRDA.
3. The Appellants are the Original Plaintiffs in Suit No. 610 of 2020 (“the Suit”) and are 98 in number, 97 of whom are purchasers of flats in a building known as ‘Universal Garden - I’ (“the said Building”) constructed on the Suit Plot. Appellant No. 98 is Universal Garden - I Flat Owners’ Welfare As
Alka Chandewar v Shamshul Ishrar Khan
Bhaiji v. SDO [(2003) 1 SCC 692
Basawaraj & Anr. v Special Land Acquisition Officer
Chedda Housing Development Corporation v Bibijan Shaikh Farid & Ors. - 2007(3) Mh.L.J 402
CIT v. Keshab Chandra Mandal AIR 1950 SC 265
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Calcutta v National Taj Traders
Delhi Financial Corpn. v. Rajiv Anand (2004) 11 SCC 625
District Mining Officer v. TISCO [(2001) 7 SCC 358]
Dwarkadas Marfatia V/s. Board of Trustees
D.C. Bhatia & Ors. v Union of India & Anr.
H.S. Vankani V/s. State of Gujarat
Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi [(2003) 1 SCC 730]
Janhit Manch through its President Bhagvanji Raiyani and Anr. v State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Kehar Singh V/s. State (Delhi Administration)
Martin Burn Ltd. v Corporation of Calcutta
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences & Ors. v Satchikitsa Prasarak Mandal & Ors.
M. Nizamudeen v. Chemplast Sanmar Limited & Ors.
Nagubai Ammal V/s. B. Shama Rao
New Bihari Leaves V/s. State of Bihar
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v Nusli Neville Wadia
Nutan Kumar V/s. Additional District Judge
Nasiruddin v. Sita Ram Agarwal [(2003) 2 SCC 577: AIR 2003 SC 1543
Nahalchand Laloochand Private Limited v. Panchali Cooperative Housing Society Limited
Pandian Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT (2003) 5 SCC 590
Rattan Chand Hira Chand V/s. Askar Nawaz
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Narmada Bachao Andolan & Anr.
Shri Ram Saha v State of W.B. & Ors.
Shabi Construction Company v City & Industrial Development Corporation and another (1995) 4 SCC 301
State of U.P. v. Hindustan Aluminium Corpn.
Swedish Match AB v. SEBI [(2004) 11 SCC 641: AIR 2004 SC 4219]
Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society v. Swaraj Developers [(2003) 6 SCC 659: AIR 2003 SC 2434
State of Jharkhand v. Govind Singh [(2005) 10 SCC 43: 2005 SCC(Cri) 1570: JT (2004) 10 SC 349
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.