JUDGMENT :

AMIT BORKAR, J.

1. Heard.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

3. Since both these applications arise from a common factual matrix and the same First Information Report, we are disposing of them by one judgment.

4. By these applications, the applicants in each application are challenging First Information Report No. 485/2020 dated 29.12.2020 registered with the non-applicant No. 1-Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

5. Since we are treating Criminal Application (APL) No. 91/2021 as a lead application, we are referring parties and pleadings as stated in Criminal Application (APL) No. 91/2020.

6. The First Information Report came to be registered against the applicants with the following accusations:

The applicant No. 1 in Criminal Application (APL) No. 312/2021 is accused No. 1 (father), applicant No. 2 is accused no. 2 (mother), and applicant No. 3 is accused no. 3 (sister) of the non-applicant No. 2. The applicants in Criminal Application (APL) No. 312/2021 are accused Nos. 4 to 6, who are purchasers of the property in dispute, admeasuring 2 acres 18 guntas out of Survey No. 25/2 admeasu