M.S.SONAK, R.N.LADDHA
Shriram R. Deshprabhu Son of Late. Rajaram S. Deshprabhu – Appellant
Versus
State of Goa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.S. Sonak, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2. Rule. The rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. Sufficient time was granted to the parties to complete pleadings, and parties were put to notice that these matters would be taken up for final disposal at the admission stage.
3. As substantially common issues of law and fact arise in each of these petitions, with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, we dispose of these three petitions with a common judgment and order. However, Writ Petition No.356/2021 will be treated as the lead petition, and allowances will be made for the distinguishing facts in the other two petitions.
4. By final award dated 29.10.2015, the Deputy Collector/S.D.O. & Land Acquisition Officer (L.A.O.) referred the disputes for apportionment of compensation between the petitioner on one hand and respondent nos.5 to 26 on the other for determination by the District Court under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The compensation amount was also direct
Naresh Kumar & Ors. Vs. Government (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Kalabharati Advertising Vs. Hemant Vimalnath Narichania
Patel Narshi Thakershi Vs. Pradyuman Singhji Arjunsinghji (1971) 3 SCC 844
Kuntesh Gupta Vs. Hindu Kanya Mahavidyalaya (1987) 4 SCC 525
Orissa Industrial Infrastructure Vs. Supai Munda & Ors. AIR 2004 SC 390
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.