PRASANNA B.VARALE, S.M.MODAK
Vishwanath Digambar Wadje – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.M. Modak, J. - The Petitioners are amongst 413 persons who were selected and recommended by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) to the Government for different post. When they appear for the examination (as per advertisement dated 10th February 2018 issued by MPSC) there was reservation in force for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC). It was as per the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) act, 2018 passed by the State Legislatures. However, these successful recommondees could not get appointment Order.
2 It was due to several reasons. When their recommendation was pending with the Government, there was ban on fresh recruitment due to Covid-19 pandemic. another reason is filing of Special Leave Petition in the Hon'ble Supreme Court by Dr. Jishri Laxmnarao Patil & there were certain orders passed therein. Ultimately Hon'ble Supreme Court struck down the SEBC act.
3 The Government issued Resolutions as per observations by Hon'ble Supreme Court and consequently, MPSC called for fresh preferences and declared revised results. The Petitione
Anupal Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh through Principal Secretary
Dinesh Kumar Kashyap vs. South East Central Railway (2019) 12 SCC 798
Jatinder Kumar vs. State of Punjab (1985) 1 SCC 122
M. Surender Reddy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2015) 8 SCC 410
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.