JUDGMENT

Manish Pitale, J. - Heard.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the writ petition finally with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the rival parties.

3. By this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged order dated 16/09/2019, passed by the Industrial Court at Nagpur, whereby an application at Exhibit-30, seeking amendment of the memo of revision petition has been rejected, on the ground that the Industrial Court while exercising revisional jurisdiction under section 44 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'MRTU & PULP act') does not have the power to permit amendment of the memo of revision petition.

4. The respondent Nos.1 and 2 filed complaint under the provisions of the MRTU & PULP act before the Labour Court contending that their services were wrongly terminated by the petitioners, as there was violation of sections 25F and 25G of the Industrial Disputes act, 1947. The reliefs sought by respondent Nos.1 and 2 were opposed by the petitioners, but by judgment and order dated 19/12/2007, the Labour Court allowed the complaint and directed respondent Nos.1 and 2