JUDGMENT

anil S. Kilor, J. - I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned a.P.P. for the respondent No.1/State. None for the respondent No.2, though served.

2. aDMIT.

3. This appeal is arising out of the rejection of pre-arrest bail to the appellant in Crime No.53 of 2022 registered with Police Station Barshitakli, District : akola for the offence punishable under Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(2)(va), 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 (for short 'the atrocities act'), vide order dated 19.03.2022 passed by additional Sessions Judge, akola in Misc. Criminal application

4. Shri Jaiswal, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the alleged incident is dated 23.01.2022, whereas the First Information Report (FIR) was lodged on 01.02.2022. He submits that the dispute has arisen out of the commercial transaction about the land and to pressurize the appellant, he has been falsely implicated in the alleged offence.

5. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is nothing to show the involvement of the appellant in the alleged offence. He submits that the alleged incident