G.S.KULKARNI
BXIN Office Parks India Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kailasa Urja Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G.S. KULKARNI, J.
1. These are three petitions filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, “the Act”) whereby the petitioners are praying for interim measures pending the arbitral proceedings.
2. Arbitration Petition (L.) No. 22526 of 2022 (BXIN Office Parks India Pvt. Ltd.) has been argued as the lead petition. The subject matter of the proceedings is quite common, namely, a dispute as raised by the petitioner in the capacity of licensors against the respondent in all these proceedings being the licensees under the respective leave and licence agreements as entered between the parties.
3. For convenience, the facts in the lead petition are required to be noted:
Bhaiji Vs. Sub Divisional Officer
Booz Allen & Hamilton Inc. Vs. SBI Home Finance Ltd. 2011 (5) SCC 532
Carona Ltd. Vs. Sumangal Holdings
Central Warehousing Corporation, Mumbai Vs. Fortpoint Automotive Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai
ING Vysya Bank Ltd. Vs. Modern India Ltd. 2008 (2) MhLJ 653
M.K. Ranganathan and Anr. Vs. Government of Madras and Ors. AIR 1955 SC 604
Mansukhlal Dhanraj Jain & Ors. Vs. Eknath Vithal Ogale
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.