Back
G.A.SANAP, SUNIL B.SHUKRE
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Santosh S/o Ramdas Kalwe – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of appeal against conviction. (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of the kidnapping and murder. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. overview of evidence and appeal proceedings. (Para 7) |
| 4. arguments regarding the circumstantial evidence. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. analysis of medical evidence and cause of death. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. legal standards for circumstantial evidence. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. witness accounts establishing last seen theory. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. demand for ransom and corroboration of testimony. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. motive for kidnapping discussed. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 10. recovery of incriminating evidence from the appellant. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 11. analysis of call records linking appellant to crime. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 12. determination of appropriateness of death penalty. (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 13. conclusion and final judgment. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
JUDGMENT :
G.A. SANAP, J.
1. In this appeal, challenge is to the judgment and order dated 05.05.2018, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-3, Nagpur whereby, the learned Judge convicted the appellant for commission of the offences under Sections 302 , 364-A and 201 of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
