Back
URMILA JOSHI PHALKE, A. S. CHANDURKAR
Megh Realty and Developers Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
learned Joint Charity Commissioner – Respondent
JUDGEMENT :
A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.
1. In this Letters Patent Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent a challenge is raised to the order dated 03.04.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.1131 of 2012 thereby dismissing the writ petition and refusing to interfere with the order passed by the learned Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur dated 27.01.2012 in proceedings under Section 36(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 (for short, the Act of 1950). By that order the learned Joint Charity Commissioner was pleased to reject the application filed by the respondent no.2-Trust seeking permission to alienate its immovable property.
2. The facts relevant for deciding the Letters Patent Appeal are that the respondent no.2-Public Trust is duly registered under the provisions of the Act of 1950. As per Schedule-I of the Act of 1950, it owns field Survey No.124 admeasuring about 7 H 70 R at Mouza - Barbadi Taluka and District Wardha. Since the members of the Trust were of the view that the said land should be utitlized towards proper upkeepment of the Trust, a resolution was passed by a majority of eleven members out of twelve for selling the said land. On
The paramount consideration in permitting the alienation of trust property is the interest, benefit, and protection of the Trust, and the transparent utilization of the sale proceeds for the betterme....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the respondent to justify and record satisfaction for high valuation based on comparable sale instances and material evidence w....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for objective consideration of the trust's decision to sell property under section 36(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950, and....
The Charity Commissioner has the authority to invite fresh offers for the sale of trust property, but must provide adequate reasoning for such actions, particularly when a valid bidding process has a....
Trustees must ensure any alienation of trust property is justified by genuine necessity and conducted transparently, safeguarding the trust's interests.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the Charity Commissioner must consider the interest, benefit, and protection of the trust when granting permission for property disposal, a....
Service Matter1 - It extends to inviting offers from the members of the public and directing the trustees to sell or transfer the trust property to a person whose bid or quotation is the best, having....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity for a transparent process in disposing of Trust property and the Charity Commissioner's role in verifying the genuine need for sellin....
The registrar's refusal to grant permission for trust property sale must be supported by evidence of prejudice to public interest; arbitrary denials are against statutory provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
