IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Sharmila U. Deshmukh, Revati Mohite Dere, JJ.
Smita Pansare & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. – Respondents
Interim Application No. 2361 of 2022
Decided On : 03-08-2022
The judgment does not refer to any specific acts or sections.
Fact of the Case:
The applicants seek the transfer of investigation in the murder case of Comrade Govind Pansare from the Special Investigating Team (SIT) to the Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) of Maharashtra. The applicants argue that the real breakthrough in the case came when ATS investigated the Nallasopara Bomb Blast case. They claim that there is a common sophisticated network of criminals and organizations behind the four murders of rationalists, and that the masterminds behind the murders have not been traced. The applicants request that the investigation be transferred to ATS without disturbing the pending case. The SIT has no objection to the transfer and suggests that some members of SIT can join the ATS team for continuity in the investigation.
Finding of the Court:
The court notes that despite the efforts of SIT, there has been no major headway in the investigation. The court emphasizes the legitimate expectation of the family of Comrade Pansare and the public to see the perpetrators brought to justice. The court decides to transfer the investigation to ATS, Maharashtra, to enable a fresh perspective and ensure a thorough investigation. The court directs the ATS to constitute a team of officers, including some from SIT, and orders SIT to hand over all investigation papers to ATS. The court also instructs SIT and CBI to provide necessary cooperation to ATS in the investigation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court transfers the investigation in the murder case of Comrade Govind Pansare from SIT to ATS, Maharashtra, to ensure a thorough investigation and bring the perpetrators to justice.
Result: The court allows the application and transfers the investigation to ATS, Maharashtra. The case is listed for compliance on a later date.
JUDGEMENT :
Revati Mohite Dere, J.
1. By this interim application, the applicants (applicants Nos. 1 and 2 are the daughter and daughter-in-law of deceased Govind Pansare) seek the following reliefs :
c. The Investigation as to identify masterminds may be handed over to dedicated team of ATS Maharashtra;
d. The Hon’ble Court may please direct the SIT Maharashtra as well as the CBI to provide all necessary cooperation to the Maharashtra ATS for the necessary hand-over of the Criminal Case No.39 of 2015”.
2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that this Court has been monitoring the investigation of the murder of Comrade Pansare in the aforesaid petition, being Writ Petition No. 3512/2015, and, that the police have been filing reports with respect to the investigation carried out by them, from time to time. He submits that several orders have been passed by this Court since 2015 till date. He submits that as far as Comrade Pansare’s case is concerned, till date, the shooters in the said case have not been arrested, much less the masterminds.
3. The principal ground for seeking transfer of the case, from Special Investigating Team (‘SIT’) which is presently conducting the investigation, to Anti-Terrorist Squad (‘ATS’), Maharashtra, is, that the real break-through in all the four murder cases i.e. in the murder cases of Dr. Dabholkar, Comrade Govind Pansare, Dr. M.M. Kalburgi and Gauri Lankesh, came when ATS, Maharashtra investigated the Nallasopara Bomb Blast case in 2019. He submits that although, the Central Bureau of Investigation (‘CBI’) had named Sarang Akolkar and Vinay Pawar (also alleged shooters in the present case) as accused in Dr. Dabholkar case, however, had subsequently dropped their names, at the time of filing of the supplementary charge-sheet on 13th February 2019, as it had transpired that two of the accused arrested in the Nallasopara case i.e. Sharad Kalaskar and Sachin Andhure, were infact the alleged shooters in Dr. Dabholkar case. He further submits that the ATS charge-sheet filed in the Nallasopara’s case on 18th February 2019 reveals the gravity of all the four cases i.e. Comrade Pansare, Dr. Dabholkar, Prof. Kalburgi and Gauri Lankesh and that the accused arrested in all the four cases as well as in the Nallasopara Bomb Blast case are front-line accused. He further submits that there exists a common sophisticated network of criminals and organization behind the four murders. In order to place on record, the gravity of the situation in all the four cases, learned counsel relied on an extract from the charge-sheet titled as ^^ng'kroknh Vksyhps mnn"ks**(Objectives of the Terrorist Groups). He further submits that in the Nallasopara case, large number of country-made bombs, gelatin sticks, electronic, non-electronic detonators, gun powder, chemicals, etc. were seized and that the investigation in the said case revealed, that after committing the murders of four rationalists, the mastermind were planning to plant bombs at the Sunburn Festival in December 2017 in Pune. According to the learned counsel, the charge-sheet in the Nallasopara case further reveals that the accused had conducted a recce of the said place (where the Sun Burn festival was to be held) and that before the event, two days training was provided for making bombs. Learned counsel submits that the investigation also revealed that two Bengali speaking trainers had given training to make bombs, however, the plan was dropped, as some of the accused came in front of the cameras. The trainers were, however, not arrested.
4. Mr. Nevagi submits that all the five charge-sheets i.e. in the murder cases of Dr. Dabholkar, Comrade Pansare, Dr. Kalburgi, Gauri Lankesh and Nallasopara Bomb Blast case, reveal that the offences are
The court has the power to transfer an investigation from one investigating agency to another to ensure a thorough investigation and bring the perpetrators to justice.
The court ruled that monitoring of an investigation is necessary until a charge-sheet is filed, after which the ordinary legal process should take over.
It is trite law that Article 21 embraces both the life and liberty of the accused as well as the interest of the victim, his or her near and dear ones, as well as of the community at large.
Crime investigation – Question of transferring investigation to CBI arises only if overwhelming reasons are made out – It cannot be done by mere asking.
The court relied on the credibility of the SIT report and witness statements to dismiss the petition for CBI investigation, emphasizing the need for a fair investigation and the absence of evidence o....
The court established that while the police have the exclusive right to conduct investigations, the judiciary has a duty to ensure that such investigations are conducted fairly and without bias, part....
Transfer of investigation requires concrete evidence of bias, not mere allegations; the integrity of the investigation must be maintained.
If a citizen, who is a defacto complainant in a criminal case alleging commission of a cognizable offence affecting violation of his legal or fundamental rights against influential persons, prays bef....
(1) Misgovernance or failure to maintain law-and-order during a brief period may not be a case of failure of constitutional machinery in context of tenets embodied in Article 356 of Constitution.(2) ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.