IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Milind N. Jadhav, A. S. Gadkari, JJ.
Akshay @ Chhotya Kachar Jedgule - Appellant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 706 OF 2017
Decided On : 08-09-2022
Last Seen Theory - Criminal Law - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 235(2); Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302 - [Section 235(2) of Cr.P.C., Section 302 of IPC] - The court discussed the 'last seen together' theory and its application in the case, emphasizing the need for clear, cogent, and unimpeachable evidence in cases based on circumstantial evidence. The court also highlighted the importance of examining the accused under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. and the burden of proof on the prosecution in cases of circumstantial evidence.
Fact of the Case:
The deceased was found dead with injuries, and the prosecution's case relied on the 'last seen together' theory. The accused explained that he had tried to help the deceased, who was in an inebriated state, and moved him to a safer place. The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence, and the guilt of the accused was to be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the chain of circumstances was incomplete, and the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court emphasized the need for clear, cogent, and unimpeachable evidence in cases based on circumstantial evidence.
Issues: The issues revolved around the application of the 'last seen together' theory, the burden of proof on the prosecution in cases of circumstantial evidence, and the need for a complete chain of circumstances to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of clear, cogent, and unimpeachable evidence in cases based on circumstantial evidence and highlighted the need for a complete chain of circumstances to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Final Decision: The impugned Judgment and Order dated 30.12.2016 was quashed and set aside, and the appellant (accused) was ordered to be released forthwith unless required to be imprisoned in any other offence.
JUDGEMENT :
Milind N. Jadhav, J.
1. This Appeal questions legality of Judgment and Order dated 30.12.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khed-Rajgurunagar, District Pune (for short, “Trial Court”) convicting the Appellant (original accused) under Section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, “Cr.P.C.”) for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (for short, “IPC”) arising out of C.R. No. 320 of 2013 registered with Narayangaon Police Station and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 5000/- and in default of payment of fine to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 4 months.
2. The gist of facts which emerge for consideration are as under:-
2.2. According to prosecution, on 17.11.2013 Kashinath Kale (uncle of first informant) gave a phone call to Popat Kale and informed him that he intended to sell his bullocks in the market at Belhe on the next day and called him to come to his house in the evening. At about 8:00 p.m. Popat Kale went to the house of Kashinath Kale.
2.3. According to prosecution, in the night of 18.11.2013, PW-2 - Raman Mutayya Devar and PW-3 - Irshad Mustak Ansari had last seen the accused and deceased together. Deceased was sleeping near Bipinkumar’s shop on that night when accused woke him up and took him towards Belheshwar School. Deceased was last seen together in the company of accused at about 9:00 p.m. by PW-2 and PW-3. According to prosecution, in the night of 18.11.2013 PW-2 and PW-3 both saw deceased sleeping near Bipinkumar’s shop and saw accused waking him up and taking him along with him.
2.4. Spot panchanama (Exh.29) was conducted by PW-8 on 19.11.2013. In the spot panchanama, 13 articles were recovered and seized from the spot of incident namely blood-stained soil, blood samples from stone, stone, shawl, two wooden battens, one pair of chappal, white cap, two bags, two pouches of tobacco and one empty cigarette packet. PW-8 prepared the inquest panchanama and sent the dead body for conducting autopsy and recorded statements of witnesses. On 20.11.2013, accused was arrested.
2.5. On 22.11.2013, at the instance of accused and in presence of panch witnesses (Exh.25) clothes i.e. jeans pant and shirt worn by accused were seized from his house. The seized articles were sent for chemical analysis/CA Report. After receiving post-mortem report and all relevant documents after completion of investigation, filed a charge-sheet before Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC), Junnar. Since the charge was under Section 302 IPC, the offence was triable exclusively by Court of Sessions, learned JMFC, Junnar committed the case to the Sessions Court for trial.
3. Prosecution’s case is based on circumstantial evidence. Prosecution has relied on the “last seen together” theory which has been upheld by the learned Trial Court in convicting the Appellant.
4. To bring home guilt of accused, prosecution examined 8 witnesses; viz. PW-1 Bhaskar Popat Kale complainant (Exh.8), PW-2 Raman Mutayya Devar (Exh.12), PW-3 Irshad Mustak Ansari (Exh.14), PW-4 Kashinath Baban Kale (Exh.17)
G. Parshwanath Vs. State Of Karnataka
Sujit Biswas Vs. State of Assam
Anjan Kumar Sarma and Ors. Vs. State of Assam
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the 'last seen together theory' and the reliance on circumstantial evidence, medical evidence, and recovery evidence to establis....
In a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence, multiple corroborative factors, including the last seen theory and absence of alternative explanations, can establish guilt beyond reasonable ....
Murder and disappearance of evidence – Whenever any doubt emanates in mind of Court, benefit shall accrue to accused and not prosecution – Conviction only on the basis of last seen together cannot be....
In circumstantial murder cases, last seen theory alone cannot sustain conviction without complete evidentiary chain excluding innocence, especially with wide time gap allowing third-party interventio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.