SUNIL B.SHUKRE, G.A.SANAP
Taradevi Chimanlalji Bhartia – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through Special Land Acquisition Officer, Katepurna Morna Project, Akola – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G. A. Sanap, J.
1. Both these appeals arise out of Judgment and Order dated 15.01.2005 passed by learned 2nd Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Akola in Land Acquisition Case No. 183 of 2000 and therefore, both these appeals are being disposed of by common judgment. First Appeal No. 282 of 2005 is filed by the claimants. First appeal No. 155 of 2005 is filed by the State of Maharashtra through Special Land Acquisition Officer, Akola. The learned Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Akola partly allowed the Land Acquisition Case/Reference and enhanced the compensation @ of Rs.100/- per Sq. Ft. for the acquired land admeasuring 15562 Sq.Ft. and @ of Rs.100/- per sq.ft for open subdivided area, admeasuring 9464 sq.ft, with consequential benefits.
2. The facts leading to the appeals are as follows:-
In the judgment for the purpose of convenience the parties would be referred by their nomenclature as mentioned in the judgment of the trial Court. Out of total land admeasuring 3.4 HR from survey No.7/2, belonging to the claimants, 0.27 R land was acquired for the purpose of constru
Chimanlal Hargovinddas vs. Spl. Land Acquisition Officer, Poona and another
Vijaysingh Liladhar .vs. Spl. Land Acquisition Officer reported in (1988) 3 SCC 760
Mahamaya Gen. Finance Co. Ltd. .vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Mehrawal Khewaji Trust (Registered), Faridkot and others vs. State of Punjab and others
State of Maharashtra vs. Digambar Bhimashankar Tandale and others
Chimanlal Hargovinddas vs. Spl. Land Acquisition Officer, Poona and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.