Back
MILIND N. JADHAV
Vitthal Shankar Nanaware – Appellant
Versus
Jitendra Shivaji Ambekar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By consent of both parties, First Appeal is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission.
2. This appeal has been filed to challenge the legality and validity of the judgment and order dated 05.05.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Baramati under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (for short “the said Act”) dismissing Claim Application No.117 of 2009 filed by the appellants. The appellants have filed the original application under Section 163A of the said Act for grant of compensation of Rs.4,68,500/-. By the impugned judgment, the learned trial court held that the application was not tenable under Section 163A of the said Act.
3. Appellants (original- applicants) are legal heirs of deceased Kailas Vithal Nanaware who met with an unfortunate accident while driving Indica Car bearing registration No. MH-12-DG-3426 on 10.03.2009, while he was on his way from Pune to Solapur at Pune Solapur highway. Deceased was 30 years old on the date of the accident. It has been brought on record before the trial court that deceased was receiving salary of Rs.6,000/- per month as he was working as driver with City Trupati Travels, Pune and in addition the
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 163A of the Motor Vehicle Act, specifically regarding the prescribed income limit for compensation el....
A claimant with an income exceeding Rs. 40,000 per annum can file a claim petition under section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and receive compensation in accordance with the structured formu....
A claim petition filed under Section 163A of the M.V. Act can be treated under Section 166 if sufficient evidence of negligence is established, ensuring just compensation.
The main legal point established is that a claim petition under section 163A of the Motor Vehicle Act should be determined within the parameters prescribed by that section and should not be treated a....
Murder occurring during felonious acts may still be classified as an accident under the Motor Vehicles Act, allowing for compensation despite the nature of the act.
When a tribunal misapplies repealed or non-existent legal provisions, it must rectify the error and adjudicate the claim under the correct statutory framework to ensure the grant of just compensation....
While the accident itself gives cause of action for relaxation of compensation under Section 163A-The cause of action for sustaining a claim under Section 166 is not merely the accident, but a tortio....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
