SUNIL B.SHUKRE, G.A.SANAP
Vijayadevi Navalkishore Bhartia – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G. A. Sanap, J.
1. Both these appeals arise out of Judgment and Order dated 10.08.2006 passed by learned Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Akola in Land Acquisition Case No. 209 of 2002 and therefore, both these appeals are being disposed of by common judgment. First Appeal No. 643 of 2006 is filed by the claimants. First appeal No. 541 of 2007 is filed by the State of Maharashtra through Collector/Special Land Acquisition Officer, Akola. The learned Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Akola partly allowed the Land Acquisition Case/Reference and enhanced the compensation @ of Rs.100/- per Sq. ft. for the plot area admeasuring 359684.44 Sq.ft., @ Rs.50/- per sq.ft for open belt area, admeasuring 108501.12 sq.ft and @ Rs.25/- per sq.ft. for the plot area in balance created due to division, admeasuring 28809.84 sq.ft, with consequential benefits.
2. The facts leading to the appeals are as follows:-
In the judgment for the purpose of convenience the parties would be referred by their nomenclature as mentioned in the judgment of the trial Court. The land bearing survey Nos. 6,
Chimanlal Hargovinddas vs. Spl. Land Acquisition Officer, Poona and another
Vijaysingh Liladhar vs. Spl. Land Acquisition Officer reported in (1988) 3 SCC 760
Mahamaya Gen. Finance Co. Ltd. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Mehrawal Khewaji Trust (Registered), Faridkot and others vs. State of Punjab and others
State of Maharashtra vs. Digambar Bhimashankar Tandale and others
Chimanlal Hargovinddas vs. Spl. Land Acquisition Officer, Poona and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.