A.S.CHANDURKAR, URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE
Rajan Shrivallabha Deshpande – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Urmila Joshi Phalke, J.
1. The petitioner has challenged the action of his de-empanelment by respondent No.1-Bank of Baroda vide communication dated 16.12.2019. A challenge is also raised to the show-cause notice dated 22.07.2020 as having been issued with premeditation.
2. The petitioner is a registered legal practitioner since 16.9.1980. He is member of Akola Bar Association and practicing at Akola District Court. He had represented various institutions such as Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, as a Special Counsel for Municipal Corporation, Akola and various educational institutions and nationalized & co-operative Banks. As per the contention of the petitioner he was on the panel of Advocates of respondent No.1-Bank of Baroda under the control of regional office Nagpur since more than 30 years.
3. In the year 2012, the petitioner was asked by Bank of Baroda, Branch at Jalna for title report (search report) in respect of property belonging to M/s. Krishidhan Seeds Limited. The petitioner was asked to submit search report of Nazul Plot No.6/3, Sheet No.26-D, situated in the area known as Mangaldas Market, Akola, Taluka and District Akola, admeasuring area 170
Mahabir Auto Stores and Others vs. Indian Oil Corporation and others
Union of India and another vs. Kunisetty Satyanarayana
Siemens Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Kalabharati Advertising vs. Hemant Vimalnath Narichania and others
Om Prakash Chautala vs. Kanwar Bhan and others
Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad vs. K. Narayana Rao
Pandurang Dattatraya Khandekar vs. Bar Council of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.