SANDEEP V. MARNE
Shrichand @ Chandanmal Sugnamal Panjwani – Appellant
Versus
Ahamed Ismayil Valodia – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The issue involved in the present petition is somewhat unique. Whether defendant in a suit for eviction filed under the provisions of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, who compromises it before National Lok Adalat by inviting a decree can subsequently question executability of that decree?
2. The respondents/landlords filed Regular Civil Suit Nos. 31/2008, 32/2008 and 33/2008 respectively for possession of suit property against petitioners/tenants under the provisions of Maharashtra Rent Control Act 1999 (‘the Rent Act’). During pendency of those suits, parties entered into compromise terms under which petitioners/tenants agreed for redevelopment of the property and the respondents/landlord agreed to hand over shops admeasuring 240 sq.ft. in the redeveloped building within a period of one year from the date of demolition of old structures. Petitioners/tenants agreed to pay consideration amount of Rs.10,00,000/- to the respondents/landlords. On 9th December, 2017, the suit was decreed in terms of the compromise before the Lok Adalat.
3. As the Petitioners/tenants failed to hand over possession of their shops for demolition, respondents/landlord instituted executio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.